OpenPsychometrics FSIQ - Review
Editorial review: strengths, limitations and current access conditions.
Verified company: Open-Source Psychometrics Project; legal entity not verified
TrustPilot Reviews: Not independently verified
Marketing Tactics: Provisional editorial assessment of pricing clarity, promotional claims and user expectations.
Question Variety: Six sections covering short-term memory, reasoning and verbal tasks; item counts vary.
Certifications: No formal test certification or clinical accreditation verified.
Result Insights: Overall estimate and component scores are advertised.
Founded in: Linked test page records an update in December 2019.
Support Quality: Support response time not tested; provisional score.
Data security: HTTPS available. No security audit or verification of internal data handling was performed.
B2B Services: Dedicated business offering not verified; provisional score.
Mobile App: A dedicated mobile app for this test was not verified.
Navigation (UX): Provisional assessment of the public page and advertised test flow.
Signup: Educational test entry does not require purchase.
Site Speed: Page accessibility checked; no controlled performance benchmark. Provisional score.
Ads: Provisional assessment; ad frequency can vary by location, device and consent.
Multilingual: Only the linked English version was reviewed; other translations were not quality-tested.
Learning center: Provisional assessment of publicly available explanatory material.
Result Accuracy: Research-informed educational demonstration; not a substitute for a supervised test.
Last check:
2026-10-12
Visit site
About OpenPsychometrics FSIQ
OpenPsychometrics provides an educational Full Scale IQ Test with six sections covering memory, reasoning and verbal abilities. It presents an overall estimate and component scores, with references and clear warnings about online-test limitations.
User Experience Analysis
This is one of the more useful new additions for exploring several cognitive abilities without a paid-result funnel. Its transparency deserves credit, while the older interface, lack of verified formal certification and online sampling limitations keep the rating below a professional assessment. Task counts differ by section, so the directory displays a variable count rather than an invented number.
Recommendations for Improvement
- Modernise the interface and accessibility while preserving open explanations.
- Provide an updated validation and norming report.
- Expand plain-language guidance on uncertainty and component scores.
Overall Assessment
The rating reflects suitability for this directory, including transparency, accessibility and useful feedback. It is an editorial comparison score, not the percentage accuracy of an IQ result. The service should be considered alongside its stated limitations and current payment terms.
Review Scope and Sources
This review uses public product information and provisional editorial scores, updated on 12 October 2026. Unknown criteria receive a conservative estimate and are identified in the assessment table. We did not purchase reports, audit security or independently validate the scoring algorithm for this update.
Sources: Test, procedure and references, Project information.